Keep in mind, Autodesk didn't develop this product. I used it from version 2005 to 20 was no less buggy than 2005. I had contacts suddenly reference the wrong coils, cross references get mixed up, etc. Quite often cross references would suddenly stop referencing each other, not update when I updated the project. Even when I stuck with Electrical, I found the drawing integrity to be quite lackluster. Meaning, someone with vanilla AutoCAD could easily go in and break links and wreak havoc on your project. Since ACADe is not designed from the ground-up to be an electrical design package, it still saves everything natively in DWG format. It's very, very easy to "break" an AutoCAD Electrical Drawing. SQL is much faster and the better packages (like Solidworks Electrical) use that instead. It slows way down once you get a few thousand. Access is horrible for large numbers of records. It uses an obsolete and ill-suited database (Microsoft Access) for it's part libraries. These are the main negatives based on my experience: I've used it before, and I don't think it's worth the money.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |